DCW Monthly: March 2026
This month’s content highlights a familiar reality in letter of credit law & practice: structure alone does not guarantee
Like certain other terms used in the LC and guarantee field, “assignable” can mean different things to different parties. Glenn Ransier reviews what the practice rules say and the importance of clarity.
From time to time, I have received standby letters of credit and/or demand guarantees (collectively undertakings) or applications requesting the issuance of an undertaking indicating that it is or should be “assignable” or with wording that: “This (insert undertaking type) may be assigned”. Thesaurus resources indicate that the strongest synonyms for the word “assignable” are “debatable” and “transferable”. This begs the question, what is the intended meaning of the term “assignable” by: a) the party requesting an issuance; and b) the party issuing the undertaking when the term is included?
Gain full access to analysis, cases, eBooks and more with a DCW Free Trial