September Roundup
September's DCW is live! We have an exciting fresh batch of content that's just launched. Scroll
When issuing banks insert complex reimbursement terms and self-serving conditions into their credits, it distorts the purpose of the product, causes problems for confirming banks, and drives exporters away from using LCs.
DCW Editorial Note: This previously unpublished material reflects the thinking and writing of Professor James E. Byrne over the period
Argentine lawyer Jorge Riva highlights how ICC rules are already providing an adequate environment for accommodating electronic means and how intense work continues for expanded use of electronic credits.
Houthi attacks in the Red Sea have led to major disruptions in global trade routes. With increased criminal activity and reduced visibility, banks are under increased pressure to meet sanctions and counter terrorism requirements.
Balancing wonder with accessibility is vital for innovation and ethical use of trade tech, especially as advancements transform trade finance, making it more efficient and secure.
Letters of credit represent the bulk of trade services offered by banks in Bangladesh and the country’s tense governmental transition has been closely watched by the industry. In this article, Bangladesh's political and economic challenges and their impact on trade are considered.
How UCC Article 5 governs letters of credit in the US, its non-variable provisions, and the legal nuances that affect issuers and beneficiaries.
This Executive Summary provides an overview of topics discussed and debated by leading professionals at the conference.
Exploring the steps and considerations for banks to effectively navigate the complexities of true sale unfunded risk participation, identifying product and regulatory nuances, and understanding practical applications through use case scenarios.
Fraud prevention is a crucial pursuit, but is an interim/hybrid solution requiring a beneficiary’s bank to vouch for the beneficiary the answer? Or does it introduce added risks?
ICC TAB 9 points out that there is a risk of documents being presented to more than one bank at the same time, especially under an LC that is freely negotiable, but it stops short of making any recommendations for avoiding this risk. Here’s my suggestion.
UCP Revision – Hot Topics from Practitioners! DCW is pleased to present the next instalment of its discussion series where experienced
Sign up to receive occasional DCW emails highlighting content