Celestial Aviation Services Ltd. v. Unicredit Bank, London Branch [2023 EWHC 663]

đź’ˇ
Celestial Aviation Services Ltd. v.
Unicredit Bank, London Branch
2023 EWHC 663

Type of Lawsuit: Beneficiaries sued Confirming Bank that alleged sanctions prohibited honouring complying demands.

Topics: Autonomy (Independence); Sanctions; Standby Letters of Credit; Statutory Interpretation; UCP600 Articles 4(a), 10(a), 15(b)

Parties:
• Applicants – AirBridge Cargo Airlines LLC and JSC Aurora Airlines
• Issuer – Sberbank Povolzhsky Head Office
• Beneficiaries – Celestial Aviation Services Ltd.
• Confirming Bank – UniCredit Bank, London Branch

Underlying Transaction: To secure lease obligations for civilian aircrafts.

LC: Seven UCP600 Standby LCs; subject to English law.

Decision: The High Court of Justice, Hancock, J., ruled in favour of Beneficiaries.

Rationale: Confirming Bank could not properly rely on UK or US sanctions to resist payment.

Factual Summary:

To secure lease obligations for civilian aircrafts, AirBridge Cargo Airlines LLC and JSC Aurora Airlines (collectively, “Applicants”), Russian companies, applied for and caused Sberbank Povolzhsky Head Office (Issuer) to issue seven standby letters of credit[[1]] in favor of Celestial Aviation Services Ltd. (Celestial-Beneficiaries), an Irish aircraft lessor.[[2]] The standbys were later confirmed by UniCredit Bank, London Branch (Confirming Bank),[[3]] were subject to English law and UCP600, and were payable in US dollars.

Read the full story

Sign up now to read the full story and get access to all posts for DCW - Individual Access, DCW - Site Access and DCW - Global Organizational Access tiers only.

Subscribe
Already have an account? Sign in

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Documentary Credit World.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.