DCW Monthly: March 2026
This month’s content highlights a familiar reality in letter of credit law & practice: structure alone does not guarantee
Even if a seller is responsible for an LC issuing bank’s failure or refusal to pay because it did
In Power Projects Sanayi Insaat Ticaret Ltd v. Star Assurance Co Ltd,[[1]] the English Commercial Court held that under
In the latest installment of this annual survey article series, Carter Klein examines the most significant letter of credit issues emerging from cases decided in 2024.
Case raises important questions and concerns about a URDG guarantee issuer’s obligations and distinguishing an independent bank guarantee from an escrow account arrangement.
Sanctions clauses that are wisely or imprudently constructed continue to be inserted into trade finance instruments and may heavily impact the legal rights and transactional obligations of involved parties.
Local Guarantor petitioned for rehearing from the Supreme People’s Court of order for Counter Guarantor to terminate payment to Local Guarantor for having committed guarantee fraud and not acting in “good faith”.
Confirmation to any modern-day documentary credit is an essential risk mitigation tool for a beneficiary that enables it to deal
Beneficiary argued that LCs are not contracts or leases and that FDIC as Receiver of closed Issuer lacked the authority to repudiate.
Most issuers of, and beneficiaries under, letters of credit are familiar with the impact a tenant bankruptcy has on the
Did English courts finally define the difference between a surety guarantee versus a demand guarantee?
Gain full access to analysis, cases, eBooks and more with a DCW Free Trial