Comment on the Windsor Township Case of the Lost Original LC

The Windsor Township v. Tompkins Financial Corp. case emphasizes the significance of original letters of credit but questions their necessity in modern electronic transactions.

Comment on the Windsor Township Case of the Lost Original LC

The case of Windsor Township v. Tompkins Financial Corp. 2022 WL 10218661, No. 592 C.D. 2021 (Pa. Commw. Ct. Oct. 18, 2022) holds that if the issuer’s letter of credit calls the original letter of credit instrument, among other documents, to be presented to effect a draw, the issuer may dishonor a presentation if a copy of the original letter of credit is presented instead.

The primary reason for issuers requiring originals of their letters of credit to be presented to effect a drawing is historically grounded on the view that it shows the issuer that it is dealing with the true beneficiary and not someone impersonating the beneficiary and making a fraudulent draw. The reason for this approach has more traction for commercial letters of credit, LCs that are negotiable, and cross-border LCs.

It makes less sense to require presentation of an original LC for straight domestic standby LCs, especially in instances where the beneficiary is known to the parties or the transaction is a structured or lawyered financing. In the case of Windsor Township, the beneficiary was a local municipal entity, presumably known to the issuing bank.

Read the full story

Sign up now to read the full story and get access to all posts for Single User, Mid Size Team and Large Team tiers only.

Subscribe
Already have an account? Sign in

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Documentary Credit World.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.