LCs That Contain a Law and Jurisdiction Clause

Given the success of practice rules and banks’ ability to more readily find resources for the proper interpretation of the rule sets, does it not make sense to avoid inclusion of a governing law or jurisdiction clause?

LCs That Contain a Law and Jurisdiction Clause

As many DCW readers may know, I am not a legal professional which begs the question: Why is he writing about letters of credit, demand guarantees and similar “independent undertakings” (IU) which may be issued subject only to law (and/or jurisdiction) or which include a governing rule set and are also subject to the laws of Country A (and any court matters to be brought in Country B jurisdiction)?

I am writing because of some recent conversations I have had with other trade finance specialists on this very topic and it is an area where opinions can differ significantly.  

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Documentary Credit World.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.